The G7 price cap on Russian seaborne oil came into force yesterday as the West tries to limit Moscow’s ability to finance its war in Ukraine, but Russia has said it would not abide by the measure even if it has to cut production.
The price cap, to be enforced by the G7 nations, the EU and Australia, comes on top of the EU’s embargo on imports of Russian crude oil by sea and similar pledges by the US, Canada, Japan and the UK.
It allows Russian oil to be shipped to third-party nations using G7 and EU tankers, insurance companies and credit institutions, only if the cargo is bought at or below the price cap.
Photo: Reuters
As the world’s key shipping and insurance firms are based in G7 nations, the cap could make it difficult for Moscow to sell its oil for a higher price.
Russia, which is the world’s second-largest oil exporter, on Sunday said that it would not accept the cap and would not sell oil that is subject to it, even if it has to cut production.
Selling oil and gas to Europe has been one of the main sources of Russian foreign currency earnings since Soviet geologists found oil and gas in the swamps of Siberia in the decades after World War II.
A source who asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the situation said that a decree was being prepared to prohibit Russian companies and traders from interacting with nations and companies guided by the cap.
In essence, such a decree would ban the export of oil and petroleum products to nations and companies that apply it.
Still, with the price cap set at US$60 per barrel, not much below the US$67 level where it closed on Friday, the EU and G7 expect Russia to still have an incentive to continue selling oil at that price, while accepting smaller profits.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday said that Beijing would continue its energy cooperation with Russia on the basis of respect and mutual benefit, following the EU’s agreement of the price cap, Russia’s RIA news agency reported.
The level of the cap is to be reviewed by the EU and G7 every two months, with the first such review in the middle of next month.
Taipei on Friday rejected Hanoi’s characterization of its recent live-fire drill near Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) as “illegal,” saying that Taiwan’s claim to the small island in the South China Sea was “unquestionable.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said in a statement that the comments made by its Vietnamese counterpart about the military’s routine live-fire drills near Itu Aba on Tuesday were “unacceptable.” Earlier on Friday, Vietnamese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Le Thi Thu Hang called Taiwan’s military activity “a serious violation of Vietnam’s territorial sovereignty,” saying it had caused tensions and complicated the situation in the region. Hang
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said it is more than doubling its US investment to US$40 billion as it plans to make 3-nanometer chips in 2026 at a second Arizona fab, adding to the chipmaker’s original plan of building a US$12 billion fab to make 4-nanometer chips in 2024. The investment would mark the largest foreign direct investment in Arizona’s history and one of the largest foreign direct investments in the history of the US, the world’s largest contract chipmaker said in a statement yesterday. In addition to the more than 10,000 construction workers at the site, TSMC’s two fabs
ENHANCEMENT: The sale would update Taiwan’s Patriot missile system to improve its missile defensive capability and deter threats, the US Department of State said The US has proposed selling Taiwan as many as 100 of its most advanced Patriot air-defense missiles along with radar and support equipment in a deal valued at US$882 million, according to a US Department of State notice obtained by Bloomberg News. The proposal was made under the provisions of a 2010 sale and so technically is not new. It is classified as an enhancement to the earlier deal, with a potential total value of US$2.81 billion. The upgrade would not change the overall value of that deal, which infuriated Beijing at the time and led it to halt planned military exchanges
‘UNITED FRONT’ TOOL? There are already many accounts on Douyin impersonating government agencies, and even Premier Su Tseng-chang, DPP Legislator Mark Ho said Lawmakers and a number of experts yesterday called on the government to ban or heavily regulate Douyin (抖音) over concerns that the short-video platform could be used by China to spread disinformation. Owned by ByteDance Ltd (字節跳動), Douyin and its international version, TikTok, are a subject of concern in democracies worldwide because of potential manipulation by the Chinese government. FBI Director Chris Wray on Friday said that Beijing might have the ability to control TikTok’s recommendation algorithm, “which allows them to manipulate content, and if they want to, to use it for influence operations.” TikTok could also be used to collect personal data